Vive l'amour!
Aug. 25th, 2006 01:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Shakespeare's Sister has a post up on the topic of "favorite romantic comedies". Some of the nominees are unknown to me; some are good, some bad, and some bizarre (Casablanca?). (All IMO, of course.) Inspired by this, I thought I'd use my own private soapbox to expound on the subject. Under the cut, then, are some of my favorites.
So, what are your picks?
- 6. Ball of Fire (1941; Barbara Stanwyck, Gary Cooper). When I was a kid, my family often watched "The Big Valley"; from this, I acquired an image of Barbara Stanwyck as Victoria Barkley, stern matriarch of the Barkley family. Ball of Fire came as a bit of a shock, featuring as it did a decades-younger Ms. Stanwyck. "Matriarch"... is not the word. ("Yowza" comes closer...) In the movie, bad-girl Stanwyck falls in with a team of academics, led by Cooper and engaged in writing an encyclopedia. (How could I resist that?) It's a bit dated, and at its best it's no more than fluff, but it's very entertaining fluff.
- 5. Sabrina (1954; Audrey Hepburn, William Holden, Humphrey Bogart). I adore Audrey Hepburn, and the sight of stuffy businessman Bogie, trying to woo a woman quite a bit younger than he is, is hilarious. Holden is surprisingly good in a lightweight role, and the snobbish chauffeur is fun. Fluff, still, but good fluff.
- 4. Roman Holiday (1953; Audrey Hepburn, Gregory Peck). This one's just as funny as Sabrina, but meatier; both leads face ethical dilemmas, and handle them in fine style. Hepburn is a runaway princess; Peck, the freelance reporter who finds and hides her. (Yes, there's a resemblance to It Happened One Night, but there are substantive differences, and I honestly prefer this one.)
- 3. His Girl Friday (1940; Rosalind Russell, Cary Grant). This is a partial remake of The Front Page (1931), which is a great movie in its own right, but not a romantic comedy; HGF switches the gender of one of the leads of TFP. Russell and Grant are reporters; she is lured out of a planned retirement by one last (heh) juicy story. Hilarious, but not for the slow of ear.
- 2. The Lion in Winter (1968; Katharine Hepburn, Peter O'Toole). This is a good deal blacker than the others on the list; Hepburn is the aging Eleanor of Aquitaine and O'Toole her estranged husband, Henry II. Kate's great, as always, with a terrifically acid tongue, but O'Toole actually outshines her from the very first scene. Romantic? Well, they're still, obviously, in love, no matter the needs of politics and power that drive them apart. Just a wonderful movie.
- 1. The Philadelphia Story (1940; Katharine Hepburn, Jimmy Stewart, Cary Grant). This was designed as a vehicle to revive Kate's flagging career, and it succeeded. She wanted Spencer Tracy and Clark Gable to play the male leads - either way would have worked - but had to... settle... for Stewart and Grant. Hepburn plays socialite Tracy Lords, on the eve of her wedding; Grant is her ex-fiancé, and Stewart is (get this) a fast-talking Easterner, a reporter sent to cover the story. This one is my favorite comedy of all time, romantic or no.
So, what are your picks?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 07:44 pm (UTC)But "My Wife Is A Gangster" was kind of fun. And I think I saw a decent Italian one once. I certainly rather watch one with Cary Grant than anything Scando-Anglo from the last 40 years.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 09:46 pm (UTC)My Wife Is A Gangster is Korean and the humor is a bit odd, but rather funny, I think.
romantic comedy
Date: 2006-08-25 09:25 pm (UTC)What's Up Doc. Streisand and O'Neal.
Much Ado About Nothing. Branaugh and Thompson.
Re: romantic comedy
Date: 2006-08-25 09:34 pm (UTC)Re: romantic comedy
Date: 2006-08-26 12:33 am (UTC)Oh. My.
And you really do need to see Much Ado. Branagh, btw, not Branaugh [g].
no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 10:26 pm (UTC)There are so many movies that style themselves "romantic comedies" when to me they are not. I don't find much funny in the My Best Friend's Wedding kind of movies, where the principals deceive their affianced or SOs, and end up with each other. It's one thing if the SO is a total jerk (or jerkette), but especially when the deceived is a decent person, I just can't empathize with the lead character doing the deceiving.
I enjoy witty dialogue, sweet romance, the second chance, mistaken identity, or the discovery of the rose in the one you thought a weed (where did THAT image pop up from?).
So, my current picks for delightful romances (that I can think of, and not in any particular order) are:
French Kiss – Meg Ryan and Kevin Kline
13 Going On 30 – Mark Ruffalo and Jennifer Garner
Kate & Leopold – Meg Ryan and Hugh Jackman
The Truth About Cats And Dogs – Janeane Garofalo and Ben Chaplin
Much Ado About Nothing – Emma Thompson and Kenneth Branagh
Say Anything – John Cusack and Ione Skye
While You Were Sleeping – Sandra Bullock and Bill Pullman
The original Sabrina. Harrison Ford is a little long in the tooth to play the romantic lead with a young girl.
Sleepless in Seattle – Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks, but NOT You’ve Got Mail
Green Card – Gerard Depardieu and Andie MacDowell
The Wedding Singer – Drew Barrymore and Adam Sandler
High Fidelity – John Cusack
The Goodbye Girl – original, not remake, with Richard Dreyfuss and Marsha Mason
Only You – Robert Downey, Jr. and Marisa Tomei
no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 10:39 pm (UTC)Ford was 53 when he appeared in the remake of Sabrina; Bogie was 55 in the original. Just FYI...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 10:54 pm (UTC)Kevin Kline is wonderful (French Kiss) in the role of the *apparent* petty thief who uses unwitting fellow traveler Meg Ryan as a "mule," unknowing that doing so would change his life forever.
Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore characters are so appealing in The Wedding Singer; we've seen it numerous times, and it never fails to charm. Don't be put off by other characters Adam Sandler has played; this is his best role, IMHO.
"Ford was 53 when he appeared in the remake of Sabrina; Bogie was 55 in the original. Just FYI..."
Somehow the age difference in a previous era where it didn't seem to matter as much didn't seem so appalling.
BTW, why *is* Breakfast at Tiffany's considered a romantic comedy? I expected an evening of witty dialogue and fluffy romance, only to feel like I was watching the German film, Der Blaue Engel (NOT quite as bad (g)). It was a very depressing movie to me, watching someone continue to self destruct.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-25 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 12:32 am (UTC)But then romance novels, which is the angle I'm coming from, by definition need what the industry calls an HEA (happily ever after) to qualify, so that's at least part of what I base it on.
And I like It Happened One Night better than Roman Holiday, any day [g]. Roman Holiday had a depressing ending.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 12:41 am (UTC)I wouldn't call the ending of Roman Holiday depressing. I'm not sure I'd even call it sad. It was right that it end that way; for them to get together long-term would have been a betrayal, on her part if not on his. Even though it had to end, their romance was a good thing, making both of them better and, I think, long-term happier people. To me, that's a happy ending. Of sorts.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 08:44 pm (UTC)I like my romances to end with everybody paired off the way I expected them to be [g].
no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 02:56 am (UTC)I've watched The Lion in Winter several times, and, no doubt, will again, but I don't regard it as a comedy, and while mutual respect and some occasional residue of affection appear now and then, I totally missed the romance :<). And I'm not even sure I like it, but I find the performance endlessly fascinating.
I agree with what I've seen of
Liked Same Time Next Year.
Love at First Bite - more fluff, but very well done fluff. Both of the last two recently out on DVD.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 04:42 am (UTC)"As I said in response to her post, DW likes You've Got Mail. I certainly don't find it repellent. What are we missing? The movie that inspired it, The Shop Around the Corner is a pleasant romantic comedy."
YMMV, and obviously many other people adored the movie, as well, as a romantic comedy. I liked the way a reviewer on www.imdb.com put it:
"Kathleen Kelly, owner of a little and famous bookstore for children's books, has an affair. Being together with Frank Navasky, a well-known journalist, she betrays him by e-mailing secretly and anonymously with a (also betraying) man whom she met in a chat room..." That pretty much sums up how I saw it. It made me uncomfortable to watch, and I couldn't empathize with the characters.
I'm afraid I didn't enjoy Same Time Next Year for the same reasons. I remember wondering where the romance was...many of the "romantic comedies" that came out during the '70s seemed to me to be premised on the breakup of marriages; I just missed the humor of it, I guess. [Maybe having a first husband who left out of the blue after two years, returned months later, and then left for good two years later sort of spoiled that genre for me.]
Another one I forgot to give a thumbs up (g) was A Walk In The Clouds. Keanu Reeves, Giancarlo Giannini, and Anthony Quinn. It's a beautiful, lush, romantic story, and although it isn't exactly a comedy, there are funny parts.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 01:53 pm (UTC)We've watched A Walk In The Clouds although I didn't get to see all of it. (DW can watch these things while ironing, sorting laundry, etc. I can't; I have to concentrate on what I'm doing.) I think she'd agree with your assessment.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 11:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 05:31 am (UTC)I really did like "Clueless" and "10 Things I Hate About You" the first two or three times I saw them.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-26 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-07 03:14 am (UTC)