I've had some time to think about the Varignon idea, and it's every bit as interesting as I hoped. It behaves in half a dozen different ways, depending on certain easily determined factors; at least some of the time, it provides a link between two things that I knew had to be connected, but couldn't define the connection until now.
One fact that I've run into repeatedly in my study of polygons: if the number of sides is odd, one set of phenomena occurs; if it's a multiple of four, a sharply different set occurs; and if it's neither - if it's even, but not a multiple of four - what happens is sort of a hybrid of the other two cases. This trichotomy recurs as regards the Varignon transform, and in most cases the result is somewhere between "Hmm, that's interesting" and "Wow!".
I really really want to start writing this stuff up, but it *has* to wait until I write the paper on isolated classes. Unfortunately, I keep changing my mind about how to structure that paper; I'd hoped to finish before the end of last summer, but now my best shot is to get it out the door by the end of the next semester.
:is frustrated:
One fact that I've run into repeatedly in my study of polygons: if the number of sides is odd, one set of phenomena occurs; if it's a multiple of four, a sharply different set occurs; and if it's neither - if it's even, but not a multiple of four - what happens is sort of a hybrid of the other two cases. This trichotomy recurs as regards the Varignon transform, and in most cases the result is somewhere between "Hmm, that's interesting" and "Wow!".
I really really want to start writing this stuff up, but it *has* to wait until I write the paper on isolated classes. Unfortunately, I keep changing my mind about how to structure that paper; I'd hoped to finish before the end of last summer, but now my best shot is to get it out the door by the end of the next semester.
:is frustrated: