I think the first three entries are very enlightening. "the"; You write of concrete things and concepts. You get to the point and deal with real issues. Look at the ranking for "a", a lowly 8. "of": You write of relationships and connections; how things fit together, how they belong together. This demonstrates an analytical approach to the concrete things and concepts you write of. "i" is in the third position, not the first, not the second. They (who in the world are "they" anyway? I've been looking for them all over but can't seem to find them.) say God should be first, others second, family and self third. So you got "i" in the right place. If you were to analyze anything from me, you'd probably get "i" in the first place, closely followed by "me". So I think this throws a positive light on your approach to the world. (p.s. don't worry, I don't believe a thing I wrote ;.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 01:05 pm (UTC)"the"; You write of concrete things and concepts. You get to the point and deal with real issues. Look at the ranking for "a", a lowly 8.
"of": You write of relationships and connections; how things fit together, how they belong together. This demonstrates an analytical approach to the concrete things and concepts you write of.
"i" is in the third position, not the first, not the second. They (who in the world are "they" anyway? I've been looking for them all over but can't seem to find them.) say God should be first, others second, family and self third. So you got "i" in the right place. If you were to analyze anything from me, you'd probably get "i" in the first place, closely followed by "me".
So I think this throws a positive light on your approach to the world.
(p.s. don't worry, I don't believe a thing I wrote ;.)