Two comments before I begin discussing this book, by Gordon Wood:
1) In reading the book, I seem to have stumbled into the middle of an argument, and I'm hearing only one side of it. Wood is tackling the question of the extent to which the American Revolution was, in fact, a revolution - a social upheaval as well as a political one, as the French and Russian Revolutions so clearly were. I have several other texts on the Revolution, but as far as I recall - it has been quite a while since I read any of them - none of them address this particular question. So, I'm not really in a position to weigh Wood's arguments against the arguments of those who disagree with him. All I can do is lay them out, to the extent that I understand them, and perhaps raise a question or two.
2) This is a meaty book, so I'm not going to try to cover it all at once. It is divided into three parts, titled "Monarchy", "Republicanism", and "Democracy", and I will divide my discussion accordingly.
( Monarchy )
1) In reading the book, I seem to have stumbled into the middle of an argument, and I'm hearing only one side of it. Wood is tackling the question of the extent to which the American Revolution was, in fact, a revolution - a social upheaval as well as a political one, as the French and Russian Revolutions so clearly were. I have several other texts on the Revolution, but as far as I recall - it has been quite a while since I read any of them - none of them address this particular question. So, I'm not really in a position to weigh Wood's arguments against the arguments of those who disagree with him. All I can do is lay them out, to the extent that I understand them, and perhaps raise a question or two.
2) This is a meaty book, so I'm not going to try to cover it all at once. It is divided into three parts, titled "Monarchy", "Republicanism", and "Democracy", and I will divide my discussion accordingly.
( Monarchy )